Jennie Garth: happy to shed her baby weight

Former 90210 star, Jennie Garth reveals in Us Weekly that her recent foray on Dancing with the Stars has allowed her to drop her baby weight faster than just diet and normal exercise. She says:
"When I decided to do [Dancing with the Stars], I did pilates three days a week and cardio twice. I hated it, but it helped. Once I started dancing, things changed faster than when I was just working out."

Like Trista Sutter a few posts ago, Garth is even more pleased that after dropping 10 pounds, she can fit into her skinny jeans:

"My jeans were a 29 when I started, and I'm wearing a 27 now," she explains. "It's great to be able to go to the back of my closet and get the clothes I wore [prebaby]."

*Sigh* It never ceases to amaze me how depressed I feel when I read things like this. Why does something like 2 inches have to be the defining feature of a woman's social value or the make or break factor for her self-esteem?

Garth's husband, Peter Facinelli apparently is happier with his wife when she is thin as well:

'It's like I got a new car!'" she tells Us. "He can't keep his hands off me. To the point that it's like, enough!"

Are you kidding me? Well, I believe it was the 'old' car that pushed out three babies and I find it really unnerving that this sort of comment is written off with a laugh like 'Oh haha! Isn't it hilarious that my husband thought I was fat and decidedly unsexy post-pregnancy but now that I'm thin, I'm once again worthy of his love!'

Source: http://www.usmagazine.com/jennie_draft

Inconceivable dilemma: Helena Bonham Carter and the myth of the 'older' mother

Actress Helena Bonham Carter discusses her struggles with infertility in the Sydney Morning Herald, a topic of conversation that most celebrity mothers tend to keep under wraps lest they damage their image of 'good' motherhood. Let's face it. Women who are infertile or who have difficulty falling pregnant are positioned culturally as 'failures' and in particular, 'older' women (especially over 40) are constantly represented as being 'selfish' for bringing a child into the world in a uterus nearing its use-by date.
For instance, in an article about pre-conception diets for 'older' mothers today, the author uses similarly negative language to explain how women of a certain age can better their chances of becoming mothers:

"Women are most fertile between 17 and 25. Over the age of 35, one woman in three will have trouble getting pregnant. It's not always the woman's fault – in 40 per cent of cases the finger can be pointed at the male. There are various reason why a woman finds it harder to conceive in these later years – there may be a structural problem with the reproductive organs, like blocked fallopian tubes, or a disease of the uterus like fibroids or endometriosis. Most cases, though, are due to a failure of ovulation – eggs just don't ripen and release when they're supposed to. This is usually because of a hormonal imbalance – at an older age, the body isn't producing enough sex hormones at the right time and in the right amounts to ovulate successfully."

As you can see from the words I've highlighted, the language of failure is invoked in talking about certain women's inability to fall pregnant. This is almost always tied to insufficient biology; as a woman ages her reproductive capacities are seen to degenerate. She is no longer valued as a 'producer' as the quote above suggests. This is in spite of the fact that 40% of causes of infertility are due to issues with the woman and 40% of causes are due to issues with a male. Yet, in an article of this nature, men's problematic reproductive capacities are never discussed. The quality of a woman's eggs are always the most important site for criticism.

Helena Bonham Carter,currently 8 months pregnant with her second child, utilised Clomid to jump start her fertility after trying for many months without a pregnancy at the age of 41. She says:

"I had a terrible reaction to it," she says. "Many people think it is the only thing that's going to make them ovulate but as it turned out I was ovulating anyway. It stressed me out beyond belief. Hormonally, I was all over the shop and I got really low emotionally. Lots of people don't have that reaction but on the internet I found a Clomid club, with people who react to the stuff discussing it online."

Fortunately, Carter fell pregnant before she had to take the next excruciating steps into IVF. I find it interesting that a number of countries including the Netherlands are trying to enforce preconception care particularly because so many 'older' women are having babies. This is seen as a way to stem the birth of babies with genetic 'defects'. Although there is good research suggesting a healthy lifestyle is beneficial in pregnancy for a number of reasons, the idea that 'older' women can only produce 'damaged' good lest they eat x number of servings of green vegetables, cut out all caffeine and lose heaps of weight is problematic. As I've said before, government have complained for ages that too many 'young' women in their late teens and early twenties are having babies out of wedlock and are too irresponsible to look after children. Yet, now that women are having babies when they are ready, they are threatened with the prospect of birthing deficient children and for being castigated as selfish for holding off on motherhood.


Off and running?: pregnancy and exercise debates

If you hadn't noticed, I love Paula Radcliffe. As a distance runner myself, Paula has always been one of my very favourite female elite athletes. Now, given her recent New York marathon win, Paula has put pregnancy and exercise back in the headlines. As many pregnant women reading this know, being ‘fit’ is no longer perceived as being incompatible with motherhood and in fact, debates surrounding exercise engages women in a never-ending cycle of bodywork and self-surveillance. For example, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) state that:

Becoming active and exercising at least 30 minutes on most, if not all, days of the week can benefit your health…Regular activity also helps keep you fit during pregnancy and may improve your ability to cope with the pain of labor. This will make it easier for you to get back in shape after the baby is born.

This commonsense approach has been increasingly endorsed by medical professionals after numerous studies investigating the benefits or risks involved in participating in strenuous exercise whilst pregnant. Even though the most recent medical research positions daily exercise as being a necessary component of a ‘healthy’ pregnancy and recommended daily amounts of exercise are closely aligned with those recommended for periods of non-pregnancy, the exercise in pregnancy debate is long-standing. In the existing literature, exercise during pregnancy pregnancy has not generally been associated with miscarriage although the research is largely inconsistent. In one of the largest studies of the link between exercise and pregnancy to date comprising a cohort of almost 93,000 Danish women revealed that certain types of exercise, particularly those marked as ‘high-impact’ were associated with miscarriage.

However, the recommendations are not as easily translated in consideration of the various activities women participate in during daily life. In many cases, a regimented physical exercise programme is much less likely to occur in pregnancy given the multiple demands and competing expectations of pregnant women’s behaviour. As the guidelines for pregnancy exercise have shifted and a number of clinical studies have demonstrated the positive benefits of moderate exercise, such public biomedical exhortations imply that pregnant women should exercise in order to have a healthy pregnancy. Fitness in pregnancy is situated within notions of 'risk', particularly with regard to how pregnant women use their bodies such that ‘fitness’ is increasingly becoming a part of a successful performance of pregnancy. In pregnancy, the attainment and maintenance of a ‘fit, risk-free, flexible, and responsible body’ is the mark of a ‘good’ mother.

Paula Radcliffe has been positioned as both an inspiration for new mums trying to 'bounce back' and also a detriment to mums who feel they could never live up to the training regimen Paula maintained throughout her pregnancy. However, I was pleased to see a great article in the New York Times today discussing the relative safety of running through pregnancy (albeit with some caution). For so long, women have been told that they cannot exercise vigorously in pregnancy for fear of raising their core temperature too high. However, given that pregnant women's blood volume increases at least 20% during pregnancy, some research has shown that this increase is what allows pregnant women to exercise safely and that body temperature should not be as much of a concern. The major concerns with exercising these days in pregnancy are questions of comfort as opposed to capability. Most importantly, numerous studies have shown that exercising in pregnancy is associated with a more positive body sense of self and body image.

In my study,my pregnant informants’ cited three primary motivations for exercising in pregnancy. First, a number of my informants cited body image, feelings of fatness and pressure to lose weight postnatally. The second motivation involves exercise as positively affecting psychological and physical well-being. Thirdly, my pregnant informants cited the need to be ‘fit’ for birth as a primary motivation for exercise. Often women cited a combination of the above three reasons.
How much did you exercise during pregnancy? I'm writing a chapter for my book on this very topic now, so I would love to hear from you.

New dads are stressed out too

A new Australian study of expectant dads has shown that 18.6% of men show high levels of psychological distress during their partner's pregnancy. Whereas it is widely known that many women experience PND upon giving birth, men tend to feel anxiety during the pregnancy. The men in the study felt a loss of control, struggled with financial responsibilities and worried about being protectors. Many also grieved the loss of their independence and the prospect of having to share their partner's attention with a third person.

I would have to agree. In my study, most of the male partners I interviewed felt a great deal of pressure to provide for and support their pregnant partners. Many men also felt very detached from the pregnancy at least until the first ultrasound when they could actually 'see' that the pregnancy was 'real' or until they could feel some movement. I found it interesting that although many of the men I spoke to were anxious about fatherhood, they were not so anxious that they felt the need to read books about the pregnancy or parenting. I think a number of men were in such denial that their lives were about to change significantly, they sort of pretended the pregnancy didn't exist until they actually had to confront the prospect of fatherhood right before the due date.

Source: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22701670-2,00.html

Paula Radcliffe wins NYC marathon


New mum Paula Radcliffe won the NYC marathon for the second time yesterday. Radcliffe has now won all seven of the marathons she has finished in her career - only at the 2004 Olympics in Athens did she drop out. She led for the entire race and says her daughter was her source of inspiration:

"I just kept repeating to myself 'I love you Isla' to keep my rhythm going."
Paula ran throughout her pregnancy last year, right up until the day Isla was born. She resumed training 12 days after the birth. Paula is one of the first elite athletes to train seriously through pregnancy. For the first five months, she ran twice a day, 75 minutes in the morning and 30 to 45 minutes in the evening. Then she cut back, running an hour in the morning and riding a stationary bike at night. She even did training regimens like hill repeats — repeatedly running up hills to build strength and endurance. She was closely monitored by her doctor.

Mothers on the run: Paula Radcliffe proves herself

Paula Radcliffe has confirmed after a marathon break of 2 years since the birth of her first child, she will compete in the New York Marathon on 4 Nov. As I've posted before extensively, female athletes constantly have to prove themselves upon having children that they can be mothers and elite sportswomen without having to compromise. Only yesterday Lisa Leslie, the great American female basketballer returned to the court after a relatively short hiatus since birth and is back on track to play this season. Paula Radcliffe has been scrutinised with an eagle eye by sports commentators who argue that the woman who has recorded the five fastest marathon times in history with six victories from seven marathon starts, including the 2004 New York race will have an unremarkable 'comeback'.

I find it bizarre that so many people (men mostly) think women are disabled when they have children. If anything, pregnancy makes female athletes stronger because their bodies have time to rest for nine whole months as a result of significantly tapering training. Paula Radcliffe is one of the most remarkable female athletes of this generation. She probably places enough pressure on herself and she is no idiot; if she didn't think she was in peak physical condition to compete at one of the most competitive marathons in the world, she wouldn't be there.

The Guardian has a great article today featuring interviews with famous female runners talking about how their bodies changed for the better after baby. Finally, women athletes are allowed to speak and are not being spoken for: http://sport.guardian.co.uk/athletics/story/0,,2203931,00.html